A process of understanding of the interactivity of elements and components in a given environment is described as systems thinking. Systems thinking presents a view that things influence each other in nature and work together to survive or perish. Systems thinking is clearly demonstrated in organizations where people, processes, and structures must collaborate to achieve certain goals. This paper examines systems thinking and systems change in a large system such as a public or private sector.

Everything that occurs in the world can be said to happen within the context of a particular system. In order to produce results, a system must accept input upon which it acts through subsystems. One of the most significant aspects of environmental interaction is to understand how systems function within a particular context in order to achieve the desired results. The understanding of what constitutes a system is important insofar as system functionalities are concerned. There are many ways to view a system. However, according to Gharajedaghi, a better view could be drawn from the understanding of the elements or parts that form a system. Some of these might be systems by themselves or overlapping systems that are bounded in space and time. This paper provides an overview of systems thinking and systems change. It particularly provides a discussion on systems thinking among larger systems as well as a strategy to support systems change through the improvement of working conditions, staff morale, and productivity. All the above-mentioned is done in order to achieve set goals, change opinion and policies, or even produce a certain social trend and technical innovations.

There are many ways to conceptualize a system. However, generally, Gharajedaghi defines a system as an organized collection of parts or subsystems, which are integrated into a given manner in order to accomplish a given goal. To achieve this goal and attain the desired output, different inputs must be available through the involved processes in order. The system has complex nature so that a slight change in any of the parts or elements that form the system will lead to a change in its overall functioning. Systems can be simple or complex, depending on the number of elements or processes that are involved. Among complex systems one can name social systems which have subsystems that are arranged in hierarchies with defined boundaries and yet must interact in the environment as an open system. Similarly, the American Association for the Advancement of Science defines a system as a collection of things that influence each other in their functionality. Consequently, it includes plants, people, communities, watersheds, and schools, which interrelate with one another within the context of an environmental setup. Thus, it is easier to understand larger systems like the public and private sector each of which consists of smaller systems’ components that form them.

In order to provide solutions to problems that are presented within the context of a system, it is important to examine different elements or parts that form a larger system. Such kind of approach is described as systems thinking. According to Boardman and Sauser, it is an approach that seeks to provide solutions to problems by viewing them as smaller elements of the overall system. Systems thinking espouses the idea that the provision of solutions should not be informed by reactionary measures to the specific parts of the system, events, or outcomes. Such parts have the potential to contribute to the development of unanticipated consequences. It is also described as a set of habits and modes of behavior that act within a framework founded on the notion that component elements of a system can be understood well in the context of the linkage with each other and other systems. Therefore, systems thinking posit that in order to understand the functionality of a system, the conceptualization of a system, regardless of its size, must be within the concept of relationships as opposed to isolation. Thus, it focuses on cyclical as opposed to linear cause and effect of problems.

Systems thinking can be implemented through the use of various concepts which might interact in order to produce the desired results. One of the concepts is the operational thinking that seeks to align the kind of thinking with the occurrences within the system. For instance, private sector practice is a rather modern concept when compared to the public sector practice. Therefore, in order to achieve synchrony in the implementation of system process, the private sector must align to the operational thinking within their systems that seeks to adapt some of the favorable processes within the public practice. In the same way, private practice is dynamic in its components of the system. There are also smaller systems, including technology and human resources that form the larger private-sector social system.

The other key concept of systems thinking is the dynamic way of thinking. It involves looking at the most recurrent patterns in the way things operate over a given period of time and offering suggestions based on these patterns. Dynamic thinking also advocates for continuous observance of the larger system with a view of identifying problematic areas and finding solutions to these areas. The advantage of this concept is that it allows the problems to be based on the verifiable and identifiable elements within the system. Therefore, it provides the best solution to the problems that may exist within the system.

For example, in order to provide a long-term solution to the problem of inefficiency in the public service, dynamic thinking advocates for analyzing each entity or element that forms the public sector service. It is done for a period of time after which the problematic areas are identified before finding solutions. Dynamic thinking is cheaper and simple to implement, but there is the caveat since it addresses problems that are in small systems that form the larger public systems. Therefore, both systems are subject to fail since it is the smaller systems that form the larger one through a system of interrelationships. It means that a simple problem in one of the systems that form the large system will affect the whole system. In order to rectify it, a dynamic process must be performed again. Thus, any simple problem will inconvenience the functioning of the whole system.

Moreover, systems thinking emphasizes on the concept of creativity when providing the solution to the problems that might be existing within the larger system. Creative thinking, as a systems thinking concept, is founded on the ability to overcome obvious solutions which are likely to have adverse side effects on the larger system. Thus, it seeks to provide creative answers that circumvent the possibilities of side effects. In a social context, where the interaction between public and private forms a complex system, resources and elements for proper implementation of the system might be a limiting factor. However, through creative thinking, solutions can be provided to solve these problems of resources and improve efficiency.

One of the identifiable illustrations where creative thinking has aided in providing solutions to large and complex systems is in the development of technology tools that facilitate communication within systems such as the use of mobile phones, computers, and more abstract means like the Internet. Creative thinking also permeates scientific thinking as part of the systems thinking concepts. Through scientific thinking, scientists are able to visualize a complex system and provide solutions to the problems by examining each element and process as well as foresee the possible outcome with particular inputs. The advantage of this kind of concept is that it can provide solutions to processes which previously were thought to be efficient in their functioning. Thus, chances of serendipitous discoveries in creative thinking are very high when compared to a holistic view of the entire system as a single unit.

Systems Change and Transformation

In order to have a system change and transformation, there is a need to have the acquisition of knowledge by the components that form the system. Thus, systems change is an approach that seeks to utilize verifiable information to bring changes in the way the overall system functions. Systems change hinges on the premise that leaders or, at least, subsystems are able to subscribe to the proposed changes as a way of achieving new ways of performing tasks. Systems change can be implemented through fostering of the community and relationships between subsystems and cultivation of networks. Through the creation of the community and networks, the elements, which are involved in the overall system functioning, including people are able to support the proposed systems change or transformation to achieve the desired goals. Systems change can also be implemented by the realization that most systems are nested or contain smaller systems and, therefore, require the implementation of changes in a multilevel approach. As observed by Moore, public social systems contain other systems within the individual or community environment. Thus, changing the system will automatically affect larger as well as nested systems. Consequently, it triggers the challenge concerning the choice of the correct level or levels to achieve the kind of changes that are intended.

From the discussion above it is evident that systems thinking is a kind of approach that views a system as a composition of parts which are directly or indirectly related to each other. The approach also posits that a system operates within a given identifiable boundary even though the systems can be parallel or nested. Systems thinking also identifies the issue of space and time as performing an essential role in the achievement of the overall goal of the system. Systems change is based on better decision-making process and greater commitment to the overall goal of the larger system. Thus, there is a need for those involved in any system to examine the elements and processes that are involved in the functionality of the system.